Judge Rules Against Production of Evidence of Post-Termination Damages in Contract Case

Mr. Hennessy served as First Chair trial counsel on behalf of a Pennsylvania employer in a case where the employee argued an entitlement to commissions on sales which were consummated post-termination.  The employee argued that the employer agreed to pay him for commissions made in markets he created regardless of employment.  Mr. Hennessy filed a pre-trial motion asking that the Court exclude evidence of post-termination commissions as such evidence was unduly speculative and without a sufficient basis in fact or law.  The Court granted the Mr. Hennessy’s pretrial motion, excluding the evidence of alleged hundreds of thousands of dollars in post-termination commissions.  The case thereafter settled on the third day of trial.

Written by

Brendan D. Hennessy, Esquire is an experienced attorney and provides an assortment of legal services, focusing in the area of Employment Law.

No Comments Yet.

Leave a Reply

Message

Wordpress SEO Plugin by SEOPressor